NetIQ Access Manager up to 4.1.2/4.2.1 SP1 input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in NetIQ Access Manager up to 4.1.2/4.2.1 SP1. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. Performing a manipulation results in input validation. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2016-5755. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in NetIQ Access Manager up to 4.1.2/4.2.1 SP1 (Access Management Software). This affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
NetIQ Access Manager 4.1 before 4.1.2 Hot Fix 1 and 4.2 before 4.2.2 was vulnerable to clickjacking attacks due to a missing SAMEORIGIN filter in the "high encryption" setting.
The bug was discovered 07/04/2016. The weakness was disclosed 03/23/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at novell.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2016-5755 since 06/23/2016. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 262 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
Upgrading to version 4.1.2 HF1 or 4.2 SP2 eliminates this vulnerability.
The entries VDB-98400, VDB-98399, VDB-98398 and VDB-98396 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.2
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Access Manager 4.1.2 HF1/4.2 SP2
Timeline
06/23/2016 🔍07/04/2016 🔍
03/23/2017 🔍
03/23/2017 🔍
03/23/2017 🔍
09/11/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: microfocus.comAdvisory: novell.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2016-5755 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-5755
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-98397
OSVDB: - CVE-2016-5755 - NetIQ - Access Manager - Clickjacking Issue
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/23/2017 15:31Updated: 09/11/2020 09:04
Changes: 03/23/2017 15:31 (60), 09/11/2020 09:04 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.