Intelliants Subrion CMS 4.0.5 admin/languages/edit/1/ Title cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Intelliants Subrion CMS 4.0.5. This affects an unknown function of the file admin/languages/edit/1/. This manipulation of the argument Title causes cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2017-6066. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Intelliants Subrion CMS 4.0.5 (Content Management System). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code of the file admin/languages/edit/1/. The manipulation of the argument title with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Subrion CMS 4.0.5 has CSRF in admin/languages/edit/1/. The attacker can perform any Edit Language action, and can optionally insert XSS via the title parameter.
The bug was discovered 02/15/2017. The weakness was disclosed 03/27/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-6066 since 02/17/2017. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 39 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 97087†). The entries VDB-98560, VDB-98559, VDB-98556 and VDB-98553 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/15/2017 🔍02/17/2017 🔍
03/26/2017 🔍
03/27/2017 🔍
03/27/2017 🔍
03/27/2017 🔍
06/30/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-6066 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-6066
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-98557
SecurityFocus: 97087 - Subrion CMS CVE-2017-6066 Cross Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/27/2017 16:26Updated: 06/30/2020 14:26
Changes: 03/27/2017 16:26 (61), 06/30/2020 14:26 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:41E:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.