CVE-2007-0060 in Unicenter Network And Systems Management
Summary
by MITRE
Stack-based buffer overflow in the Message Queuing Server (Cam.exe) in CA (formerly Computer Associates) Message Queuing (CAM / CAFT) software before 1.11 Build 54_4 on Windows and NetWare, as used in CA Advantage Data Transport, eTrust Admin, certain BrightStor products, certain CleverPath products, and certain Unicenter products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted message to TCP port 3104.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 06/14/2025
The vulnerability described in CVE-2007-0060 represents a critical stack-based buffer overflow affecting the Message Queuing Server component known as Cam.exe within CA Message Queuing software. This flaw exists in versions prior to 1.11 Build 54_4 and impacts multiple CA products including Advantage Data Transport, eTrust Admin, BrightStor, CleverPath, and Unicenter platforms across both Windows and NetWare operating systems. The vulnerability specifically manifests when the server processes incoming messages on TCP port 3104, creating a remote code execution vector that can be exploited by malicious actors without authentication. The buffer overflow occurs due to inadequate input validation and bounds checking within the message processing logic, allowing attackers to overwrite adjacent memory locations on the stack.
This particular vulnerability aligns with CWE-121 Stack-based Buffer Overflow, which is classified as a fundamental weakness in software design where insufficient bounds checking allows attackers to overwrite stack memory and potentially execute arbitrary code. The attack surface is particularly concerning as it operates over network protocols and does not require user interaction or authentication, making it highly exploitable in targeted environments. The operational impact extends beyond simple code execution to potentially compromise entire network infrastructure, as CAM software often serves as a critical messaging backbone for enterprise applications. Attackers leveraging this vulnerability can gain unauthorized access to systems, escalate privileges, and potentially establish persistent backdoors within network environments.
The exploitation of this vulnerability demonstrates techniques consistent with ATT&CK tactic T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter and T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation, where attackers can leverage the buffer overflow to inject malicious payloads into memory space and execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the affected service. The affected products typically run with elevated privileges due to their role in enterprise messaging, amplifying the potential damage from successful exploitation. Organizations using these legacy products face significant risk as the vulnerability affects multiple generations of CA software, including products that may still be in production environments despite being outdated. The remote nature of the attack means that exploitation can occur from anywhere on the internet, making traditional network segmentation ineffective as a protective measure.
Organizations should prioritize immediate patching of affected systems to address this vulnerability, as no reliable workarounds exist for the buffer overflow itself. The remediation process requires careful consideration of compatibility impacts, especially in enterprise environments where legacy CAM software may be integrated with critical business applications. Security teams should implement network segmentation to restrict access to TCP port 3104, though this does not eliminate the threat entirely as the vulnerability can be exploited through various attack vectors. Additional monitoring should focus on anomalous network traffic patterns on port 3104 and unusual process behaviors that might indicate exploitation attempts. The vulnerability also highlights the importance of maintaining up-to-date security patches across all enterprise messaging infrastructure components, as similar vulnerabilities may exist in other legacy systems within the same product portfolio. Organizations should conduct comprehensive vulnerability assessments to identify any other potentially affected CA products or components that might share similar architectural flaws.