CVE-2008-5382 in Hlf-f320
Summary
by MITRE
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in I-O DATA DEVICE HDL-F160, HDL-F250, HDL-F300, and HDL-F320 firmware before 1.02 allows remote attackers to (1) change a configuration or (2) delete files as an authenticated user via unknown vectors. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 11/25/2017
The CVE-2008-5382 vulnerability represents a critical cross-site request forgery flaw affecting I-O DATA DEVICE network storage appliances including the HDL-F160, HDL-F250, HDL-F300, and HDL-F320 models. This vulnerability resides within the firmware versions prior to 1.02 and demonstrates a fundamental weakness in the authentication and request validation mechanisms of these network-attached storage devices. The flaw enables remote attackers to manipulate device configurations and execute file deletion operations without proper authorization, effectively compromising the integrity and availability of the affected systems. The vulnerability's classification as CSRF aligns with CWE-352, which specifically addresses cross-site request forgery conditions where web applications fail to validate the origin of requests. This weakness allows attackers to exploit the trust relationship between authenticated users and the web interface, potentially leading to unauthorized administrative actions.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability stems from the absence of proper anti-CSRF token validation within the device's web administration interface. When legitimate users authenticate to the device's web management console, the system should validate that subsequent requests originate from the authenticated session rather than being forged by external parties. However, the affected firmware versions lack this crucial validation mechanism, enabling attackers to craft malicious requests that appear to originate from authenticated users. The attack vectors remain unspecified in the original report, suggesting that the vulnerability could be exploited through various means including crafted web pages, email attachments, or other social engineering techniques that prompt authenticated users to interact with malicious content. This ambiguity in attack methodology increases the exploitability and severity of the vulnerability, as it could be leveraged through multiple delivery mechanisms without requiring specific user interaction beyond normal browsing behavior.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple configuration changes to include critical file deletion capabilities, making it particularly dangerous for network storage environments. Attackers could potentially compromise entire storage systems by deleting important files, modifying critical network configurations, or altering access controls that govern user permissions. The affected devices operate as network-attached storage solutions, making them attractive targets for attackers seeking to disrupt business operations or gain unauthorized access to sensitive data. The remote nature of the attack means that exploitation does not require physical access to the devices, and attackers could potentially target multiple units simultaneously from a single location. This vulnerability directly impacts the availability and integrity of data stored on these devices, potentially leading to complete system compromise and data loss scenarios that could affect organizations relying on these storage solutions for critical business operations.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability primarily focus on firmware updates and implementation of additional security controls. Organizations should immediately upgrade all affected devices to firmware version 1.02 or later, which contains the necessary patches to address the CSRF vulnerability. Beyond firmware updates, implementing additional security measures such as network segmentation, access control lists, and monitoring of administrative activities can help detect and prevent exploitation attempts. The vulnerability highlights the importance of proper input validation and request origin verification in web applications, aligning with ATT&CK technique T1566 for credential access through social engineering and T1499 for endpoint disruption. Network administrators should also consider implementing web application firewalls and intrusion detection systems to monitor for suspicious activity patterns that may indicate CSRF attack attempts. Regular security assessments and vulnerability scanning should be conducted to identify similar weaknesses in other network devices and applications, as this vulnerability demonstrates how seemingly minor implementation flaws can lead to significant security breaches in network infrastructure components.