I-O DATA Hlf-f320 up to 1.1 Firmware cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in I-O DATA Hlf-f320 up to 1.1. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Firmware. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2008-5382. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in I-O DATA Hlf-f320 up to 1.1 and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown functionality of the component Firmware. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in I-O DATA DEVICE HDL-F160, HDL-F250, HDL-F300, and HDL-F320 firmware before 1.02 allows remote attackers to (1) change a configuration or (2) delete files as an authenticated user via unknown vectors. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
The weakness was disclosed 11/26/2008 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at jvn.jp. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2008-5382 since 12/08/2008. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available.
It is declared as highly functional.
Upgrading to version 1.02 eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (46880), OSVDB (50183†) and Secunia (SA32836†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Highly functional
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Hlf-f320 1.02
Timeline
11/26/2008 🔍11/26/2008 🔍
11/26/2008 🔍
11/26/2008 🔍
12/08/2008 🔍
12/08/2008 🔍
03/17/2015 🔍
11/25/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: jvn.jpStatus: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2008-5382 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2008-5382
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-45347
X-Force: 46880 - I-O DATA HDL-F unspecified cross-site request forgery
Secunia: 32836 - I-O DATA HDL-F Series Cross-Site Request Forgery, Less Critical
OSVDB: 50183 - I-O DATA HDL-F Series Unspecified CSRF
Entry
Created: 03/17/2015 16:11Updated: 11/25/2017 10:03
Changes: 03/17/2015 16:11 (53), 11/25/2017 10:03 (7)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.