CVE-2013-2350 in Storage Data Protector
Summary
by MITRE
Unspecified vulnerability in HP Storage Data Protector 6.2X allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-1897.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 01/18/2022
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2013-2350 represents a critical security flaw within HP Storage Data Protector version 6.2X, a comprehensive data protection solution designed to safeguard enterprise storage environments. This unspecified vulnerability creates a significant attack surface that could be exploited by remote threat actors to gain unauthorized control over affected systems. The issue was disclosed through the Zero Day Initiative (ZDI) under the CAN number 1897, indicating that it was recognized as a potential threat before widespread public awareness, highlighting the sophisticated nature of the security community's monitoring efforts. The vulnerability's classification as unspecified suggests that the exact technical mechanism remains partially obscured, but the implications for system integrity are severe enough to warrant immediate attention from security professionals.
The technical nature of this vulnerability lies in its ability to permit remote code execution or denial of service attacks through unknown vectors, meaning that attackers can potentially gain system-level privileges or disrupt service availability without requiring physical access to the target infrastructure. This type of vulnerability typically stems from improper input validation, buffer overflows, or memory corruption issues that allow malicious payloads to be injected and executed within the application context. Given that HP Storage Data Protector operates as a centralized data protection solution, successful exploitation could compromise entire storage networks, making this vulnerability particularly dangerous for enterprise environments that rely heavily on automated backup and recovery operations. The remote attack vector eliminates the need for insider access or physical presence, significantly expanding the potential threat landscape.
The operational impact of CVE-2013-2350 extends far beyond simple system compromise, as data protection systems form the backbone of enterprise disaster recovery and business continuity strategies. Organizations using affected versions of HP Storage Data Protector could face catastrophic consequences including complete data loss, system downtime, and potential data breaches that could expose sensitive corporate information. The vulnerability's potential for denial of service attacks could render critical backup operations unusable during actual emergency situations, effectively eliminating the organization's ability to recover from system failures or security incidents. This scenario aligns with attack patterns documented in the MITRE ATT&CK framework under the 'Execution' and 'Impact' domains, where adversaries seek to establish persistent access or cause operational disruption to maximize their threat impact.
Mitigation strategies for this vulnerability should prioritize immediate patch management and system updates from HP, as the company would have likely released security patches addressing the specific flaw. Organizations should implement network segmentation to limit access to the affected systems, deploy intrusion detection systems to monitor for exploitation attempts, and establish comprehensive backup procedures that can be activated immediately if system compromise occurs. The vulnerability's nature suggests that it may be related to common software security weaknesses such as those categorized under CWE-119 (Memory Buffer Errors) or CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling), making defensive measures such as input validation, resource monitoring, and application hardening essential components of the overall security posture. Security teams should also consider conducting thorough vulnerability assessments of their entire storage infrastructure to identify potential similar vulnerabilities that may exist within related systems or components.