CVE-2018-25287 in Drive Power Manager
Summary
by MITRE • 04/27/2026
Drive Power Manager 1.10 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by supplying an excessively long string in the Name field. Attackers can paste a 6000-byte payload into the Name field and click Register to trigger a denial of service condition.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 05/24/2026
The Drive Power Manager 1.10 software presents a critical buffer overflow vulnerability that stems from inadequate input validation within its registration process. This flaw exists in the handling of user-supplied data in the Name field, where the application fails to properly bounds-check the length of incoming strings before processing them. The vulnerability manifests when an attacker supplies an excessively long payload of 6000 bytes, which exceeds the allocated buffer space and causes the application to crash or terminate unexpectedly. This type of vulnerability falls under the common weakness enumeration CWE-121, which describes buffer overflow conditions where insufficient space is allocated for data storage, leading to memory corruption and application instability. The attack vector is particularly concerning as it requires minimal privileges since the vulnerability exists within a local application context, making it accessible to any user with access to the software interface. The denial of service condition triggered by this buffer overflow directly impacts system availability and can potentially disrupt legitimate users who rely on the power management functionality for device operation.
The technical implementation of this vulnerability demonstrates poor memory management practices where the application does not enforce proper string length limitations or employ safe string handling functions. When the 6000-byte payload is entered into the Name field and the Register button is clicked, the application's memory management routines fail to handle the oversized input gracefully, resulting in stack corruption or heap overflow conditions. This type of vulnerability is classified as a local privilege escalation vector within the MITRE ATT&CK framework, specifically categorized under T1499.004 for Network Denial of Service and T1068 for Exploitation for Privilege Escalation. The vulnerability's impact extends beyond simple application crash since buffer overflows often represent precursors to more severe exploitation techniques, including code execution or privilege escalation. The software's failure to implement input sanitization mechanisms or utilize secure coding practices such as those recommended by the CERT/CC Secure Coding Standards demonstrates a fundamental lack of security awareness in the development lifecycle. The vulnerability affects the application's core functionality by preventing legitimate users from registering devices or managing power settings through the standard interface.
The operational impact of this vulnerability creates significant risks for system administrators and end users who depend on Drive Power Manager for device power management. When the application crashes due to buffer overflow exploitation, users lose access to critical power management features that may be required for device operation or battery optimization. The vulnerability can be exploited repeatedly, allowing attackers to maintain persistent denial of service conditions that may require system restarts or manual intervention to resolve. In enterprise environments, this could result in widespread disruption of power management services across multiple devices, potentially affecting device performance and battery life optimization. The vulnerability also presents a potential security risk beyond simple denial of service, as buffer overflows are commonly exploited as initial access vectors in more sophisticated attack chains. The lack of proper error handling and input validation means that the application does not provide meaningful feedback to users when encountering malformed input, which can obscure other underlying security issues. Security teams should consider implementing application whitelisting or sandboxing measures to limit the impact of this vulnerability while a permanent fix is developed, as the software's failure to properly validate user input represents a fundamental security flaw that could be exploited in more complex attack scenarios.