CVE-2019-9597 in Enterprise Immune System
Summary
by MITRE
Darktrace Enterprise Immune System before 3.1 allows CSRF via the /config endpoint.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 01/27/2024
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2019-9597 affects the Darktrace Enterprise Immune System platform prior to version 3.1, representing a critical cross-site request forgery weakness that could enable unauthorized administrative actions. This flaw resides within the /config endpoint of the system, which is designed to manage and configure the platform's security parameters and operational settings. The vulnerability stems from the absence of proper anti-CSRF protections in the configuration interface, allowing attackers to manipulate the system's configuration without proper authorization.
Cross-site request forgery attacks exploit the trust relationship between a web application and its users by tricking authenticated users into executing unintended commands. In this case, the /config endpoint lacks anti-CSRF tokens or similar protective mechanisms that would validate the authenticity of requests originating from legitimate administrative sessions. Attackers could craft malicious web pages or exploit existing user sessions to submit configuration changes that would alter the system's security posture, potentially leading to complete system compromise or unauthorized access to sensitive network data. The vulnerability aligns with CWE-352, which specifically addresses Cross-Site Request Forgery weaknesses in web applications.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple configuration changes, as the Darktrace Enterprise Immune System serves as a critical network security monitoring solution that protects enterprise environments from sophisticated cyber threats. An attacker exploiting this CSRF vulnerability could potentially disable security monitoring capabilities, modify detection rules, alter network behavior thresholds, or even redirect system communications to malicious endpoints. This would effectively undermine the platform's ability to protect against advanced persistent threats and other cyber attacks, creating a significant security gap in enterprise networks that rely on Darktrace for threat detection and response.
The exploitation of this vulnerability requires minimal technical sophistication and could be accomplished through various attack vectors including phishing campaigns, compromised user sessions, or by leveraging existing network access to craft malicious requests. Security professionals should note that the vulnerability affects the platform's administrative interface, meaning that successful exploitation could provide attackers with elevated privileges and complete control over the security monitoring system. Organizations using affected versions of Darktrace should immediately implement mitigations including patching to version 3.1 or later, implementing additional network segmentation controls, and monitoring for unauthorized configuration changes in their security infrastructure. This vulnerability demonstrates the critical importance of validating all administrative endpoints and implementing robust anti-CSRF protections in security applications that handle sensitive configuration data.
The presence of this vulnerability in a security platform like Darktrace highlights the importance of proper input validation and authentication mechanisms in cybersecurity tools, as these systems often serve as the last line of defense in enterprise security architectures. Organizations should consider implementing additional monitoring and logging controls around administrative endpoints to detect potential CSRF attacks, while also ensuring that security patches are deployed promptly to address known vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure components. The ATT&CK framework would categorize this vulnerability under the T1078 technique for Valid Accounts, as exploitation would require legitimate administrative access, but the specific attack vector would fall under T1566 for Phishing with Malicious Attachments or T1531 for Account Access Removal if the attack successfully modifies system configurations to disable monitoring capabilities.