CVE-2024-23566 in Aftermarket EPC
Summary
by MITRE • 07/17/2026
HCL Aftermarket EPC is vulnerable to brute force attacks since application doesn’t have captcha implemented. It can lead to various security issues like brute force , automated attacks & account enumeration
VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 07/17/2026
The HCL Aftermarket EPC vulnerability represents a critical authentication weakness that exposes the system to automated attack vectors due to the absence of protective mechanisms against brute force attempts. This security flaw fundamentally undermines the integrity of the application's user authentication process, creating an environment where malicious actors can systematically attempt multiple credential combinations without restriction. The lack of captcha implementation removes essential barriers that would normally slow down or prevent automated attack scripts from overwhelming the system's login mechanisms.
This vulnerability aligns with CWE-307 which specifically addresses improper restriction of repeated authentication attempts, and demonstrates how insufficient access control measures can create pathways for unauthorized system access. The absence of rate limiting, account lockout mechanisms, or CAPTCHA verification creates a scenario where attackers can leverage automated tools to conduct dictionary attacks, credential stuffing operations, or simple password guessing campaigns without facing meaningful obstacles. The operational impact extends beyond mere unauthorized access as this weakness enables account enumeration techniques that allow attackers to identify valid user accounts within the system.
The implications of this vulnerability encompass multiple attack vectors categorized under the MITRE ATT&CK framework, particularly targeting the credential access and privilege escalation domains. Attackers can exploit this weakness to conduct systematic brute force campaigns that may result in complete account compromise, leading to potential data breaches, unauthorized system modifications, or lateral movement within network environments. The vulnerability creates a persistent risk surface where automated tools can continuously probe authentication endpoints without detection or mitigation.
Organizations should implement comprehensive mitigation strategies including robust CAPTCHA mechanisms, account lockout policies after failed attempts, rate limiting for authentication requests, and monitoring systems to detect unusual login patterns. Additionally, the implementation of multi-factor authentication serves as an effective compensating control that would significantly reduce the impact even if brute force attacks were successful. Security architects must also consider integrating intrusion detection systems that can identify and respond to automated attack patterns, while ensuring that all authentication endpoints maintain consistent security postures across the entire application ecosystem.
The vulnerability demonstrates how basic security controls can be overlooked in favor of user experience considerations, creating dangerous trade-offs between accessibility and protection. This flaw requires immediate remediation through defensive programming practices that enforce proper access control mechanisms and implement comprehensive authentication security measures. Organizations should conduct regular security assessments to identify similar weaknesses across their application portfolios and establish security requirements that mandate protective controls for all authentication pathways. The remediation process must include thorough testing to ensure that implemented controls effectively prevent the identified attack vectors while maintaining legitimate user accessibility.