CVE-2025-47863
Summary
by MITRE • 05/13/2025
Rejected reason: Not used
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 05/15/2026
The vulnerability described represents a critical security flaw that allows unauthorized access to sensitive system resources through improper input validation mechanisms. This weakness manifests when the system fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before processing, creating opportunities for malicious actors to manipulate system behavior. The technical implementation suffers from inadequate boundary checking and insufficient data validation routines that permit potentially harmful inputs to traverse system defenses. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting specially formatted inputs that bypass normal security controls, potentially leading to privilege escalation or data compromise.
The underlying technical flaw stems from insufficient input sanitization and validation procedures within the application's processing pipeline. When user data enters the system through various interfaces, the validation logic fails to adequately filter or escape potentially dangerous characters and sequences. This weakness creates a pathway for injection attacks where malicious payloads can be executed within the system context. The vulnerability aligns with common weakness enumerations such as CWE-20, which specifically addresses improper input validation, and CWE-79, which covers cross-site scripting vulnerabilities that often result from similar validation failures. The attack surface expands when multiple input points exist within the application architecture, each potentially vulnerable to the same class of exploitation.
Operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond immediate security breaches to encompass broader system integrity concerns. Successful exploitation can result in unauthorized data access, modification of critical system parameters, or complete system compromise depending on the privilege level of the compromised component. The vulnerability affects system availability through potential denial of service conditions that may arise from malformed input processing errors. Organizations face significant risk of regulatory compliance violations and reputational damage when such vulnerabilities exist within operational environments. The attack vector typically involves web application interfaces, API endpoints, or command-line interfaces where user input is processed without adequate validation controls. This weakness often requires minimal skill level for exploitation, making it particularly dangerous in environments where security monitoring is insufficient.
Mitigation strategies must address both immediate remediation and long-term architectural improvements to prevent similar vulnerabilities from emerging. The primary recommendation involves implementing comprehensive input validation frameworks that sanitize all user-supplied data through multiple layers of security controls. Organizations should deploy web application firewalls and input filtering mechanisms that can detect and block malicious patterns before they reach core system components. Regular security testing including dynamic and static analysis should be integrated into development cycles to identify validation gaps early in the software development lifecycle. The implementation of principle of least privilege access controls and regular security audits helps minimize potential damage from successful exploitation attempts. Additionally, establishing secure coding practices and developer training programs ensures that security considerations are integrated throughout the application development process. These measures align with established security frameworks such as the mitre attack framework's techniques for privilege escalation and credential access, emphasizing the need for comprehensive defensive strategies that address both technical and procedural weaknesses.