CVE-2026-108054 in ALO Suite
Summary
by MITRE • 11/03/2026
A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows:
CVE-2026-108054: Nombre in ‘/Familias/Edit/{id}’;
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 11/03/2026
The vulnerability identified under CVE-2026-108054 represents a critical stored Cross-Site Scripting flaw within the Alosuite enterprise resource planning software, specifically targeting the delivery note management module. This security defect arises from insufficient sanitization and encoding of user-supplied input in the Nombre field during the editing process for family records accessed via the endpoint /Familias/Edit/{id}. Unlike reflected XSS attacks where malicious scripts are executed immediately through a crafted link, stored vulnerabilities persist by saving the injected payload into the application's backend database. Consequently, every subsequent request to view or edit these specific delivery note records triggers the execution of the malicious JavaScript code in the browser of any authenticated user who accesses the affected data. This persistence mechanism significantly amplifies the attack surface and impact potential compared to transient injection flaws.
From a technical perspective, the root cause lies in the application's failure to properly validate and encode special characters within the Nombre parameter before storing it in the database or rendering it back to the client side without appropriate context-aware encoding. When an authenticated attacker submits malicious JavaScript code through this field, the server accepts and stores the input as valid data. Later, when another user navigates to view these delivery notes, the browser interprets the stored script as executable content rather than plain text. This breakdown in output encoding allows the injected script to run with the same privileges and context as the legitimate application code, effectively bypassing client-side security controls such as Content Security Policy if not strictly configured or easily overridden by dynamic script injection techniques common in modern web applications.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is severe due to its potential for session hijacking and data manipulation within the Alosuite environment. Since exploitation requires authenticated access, it targets users who have already been verified by the system, thereby leveraging their existing trust relationship with the application. An attacker can utilize the executed JavaScript to steal sensitive information such as session cookies, authentication tokens, or personally identifiable information displayed on the page. Furthermore, the script can perform actions within the context of the victim’s session, allowing for unauthorized modifications to delivery records, creation of fake entries, or redirection of users to phishing sites that mimic legitimate Alosuite interfaces. This capability undermines the integrity and confidentiality of critical business logistics data managed by the software.
In terms of industry classification standards, this vulnerability aligns with CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation commonly known as Cross-site Scripting. Specifically, it falls under the sub-category of Stored XSS where malicious scripts are permanently stored within target servers. Additionally, from a tactical perspective relevant to threat intelligence frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK, this vulnerability facilitates techniques associated with Collection and Credential Access, particularly through browser session hijacking or keylogging if the injected script is sophisticated enough. It also supports lateral movement within an organization by compromising multiple user accounts sequentially as they access the tainted records, thereby escalating the risk from a single-point failure to a systemic compromise of the logistics module.
Mitigation strategies must focus on both immediate remediation and long-term architectural improvements. The primary fix involves implementing rigorous input validation and output encoding for all fields involved in the delivery note functionality, particularly the Nombre parameter at the /Familias/Edit/{id} endpoint. Developers should employ context-aware encoding techniques that escape special characters based on where they are rendered within HTML, JavaScript, or URL contexts to ensure that user input is treated strictly as data rather than executable code. Additionally, implementing a Content Security Policy header can help mitigate the impact of any remaining XSS vulnerabilities by restricting the sources from which scripts can be loaded and executed. Regular security audits, static application security testing, and penetration testing focused on injection flaws are essential to identify similar weaknesses across other modules before they can be exploited in production environments.