CVE-2026-112091 in dairy-management-system
Summary
by MITRE • 10/19/2026
A flaw has been found in Dav-ee dairy-management-system 31ace9692d1e1e6d64339a42c463b361319c615c/f31a584c3330c013b61f8b0306d9e0849c6d693d. Impacted is an unknown function of the file delivery/checkfarmer.json.php of the component AJAX Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument fname causes information disclosure. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/19/2026
The vulnerability identified in Dav-ee dairy-management-system involves a critical information disclosure flaw within its AJAX endpoint component, specifically located in the file delivery/checkfarmer.json.php. This security defect arises from improper validation and sanitization of user-supplied input passed via the fname argument. The system fails to adequately restrict or filter this parameter before processing it, allowing an attacker to manipulate the request in a way that causes the application to return sensitive internal information rather than expected operational data. Because this endpoint is accessible over the network, the vulnerability can be exploited remotely without requiring prior authentication, significantly lowering the barrier for entry for potential attackers targeting the system.
From a technical perspective, this flaw aligns with CWE-209, which describes an Information Exposure Through an Error Message, or potentially CWE-200 if it involves general exposure of sensitive information such as stack traces, file paths, or internal database structures that are not intended for public consumption. The lack of proper input validation on the fname parameter suggests a failure in implementing robust access controls and output encoding mechanisms. When the application processes this malformed request, it likely leaks details about the underlying server environment, configuration files, or user data associated with the farmer records being queried. This type of error handling deficiency is common in web applications that prioritize rapid development over security rigor, particularly those following a rolling release model where continuous delivery may bypass rigorous security testing phases.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple information leakage. By exposing internal system details, attackers can gather intelligence necessary for further exploitation attempts. This could include identifying valid user IDs, discovering file structures on the server, or uncovering other potential injection points within the application logic. In the context of a dairy management system, which likely handles sensitive agricultural and business data, such information disclosure compromises confidentiality requirements mandated by various industry standards and regulatory frameworks. The availability of published exploits means that automated scanning tools and malicious actors can easily leverage this weakness to probe for additional vulnerabilities or initiate more sophisticated attacks against the infrastructure hosting the application.
Mitigation strategies must focus on immediate remediation of the input validation logic within the checkfarmer.json.php file. Developers should implement strict allow-listing for the fname parameter, ensuring that only expected and safe values are processed by the backend functions. Additionally, error handling mechanisms should be configured to return generic messages to clients while logging detailed errors securely on the server side to prevent stack traces or internal paths from being displayed in HTTP responses. Implementing Web Application Firewall rules can also provide a temporary layer of defense by detecting and blocking requests with suspicious patterns associated with this specific parameter manipulation. Since the project follows a rolling release approach, users should monitor official channels for updates that address this issue, as version-specific patch information is not explicitly documented due to the continuous delivery model.
This incident highlights the importance of integrating security testing into CI/CD pipelines for projects utilizing rapid deployment cycles. The ATT&CK framework categorizes such activities under T1087, Account Discovery, if the leaked data reveals user accounts, or T1530, Data from Cloud Storage Object Dumps, depending on what specific information is exposed. Addressing these vulnerabilities requires a shift towards secure coding practices that prioritize input validation and error management as core components of development rather than afterthoughts. Until an official patch is released by the maintainers, organizations relying on this software should consider isolating the affected service behind additional network controls or restricting access to trusted IP ranges to minimize exposure to remote exploitation attempts.