CVE-2026-114252 in Sales-and-Inventory-System
Summary
by MITRE • 10/21/2026
A vulnerability was found in itsourcecode Sales-and-Inventory-System up to 0a3c45a78aaff3601b8cf9ce8ba82ff5c345caac. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /pages/cust_searchfrm.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product uses a rolling release model to deliver continuous updates. As a result, specific version information for affected or updated releases is not available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/21/2026
The identified vulnerability resides within itsourcecode Sales-and-Inventory-System, specifically affecting versions up to commit 0a3c45a78aaff3601b8cf9ce8ba82ff5c345caac. The root cause is located in the file /pages/cust_searchfrm.php, where an unknown function fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input before incorporating it into a database query. This architectural flaw allows for SQL injection attacks, which are among the most critical and prevalent security risks in web applications according to industry standards such as CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command. The vulnerability is triggered by manipulating the ID argument passed through this endpoint, indicating that the application directly concatenates or interpolates user input into SQL statements without adequate validation or parameterization.
From a technical perspective, the lack of proper input sanitization means that an attacker can inject malicious SQL code into the ID field. This could allow for unauthorized data access, modification, or deletion within the underlying database. Since the system is designed as a sales and inventory management tool, it likely contains sensitive business information including customer details, transaction histories, and stock levels. The exploitation of this vulnerability does not require authentication if the endpoint is publicly accessible, allowing remote attackers to initiate attacks from any location with network connectivity to the target server. This aligns with ATT&CK technique T1190: Exploit Public-Facing Application, where adversaries leverage vulnerabilities in internet-facing services to gain initial access or escalate privileges within a compromised environment.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is significant due to the nature of the data handled by the system. Successful exploitation could lead to full database compromise, enabling attackers to extract sensitive customer personally identifiable information (PII), financial records, and proprietary inventory data. Furthermore, depending on the specific SQL dialect and server configuration, advanced injection techniques might allow for command execution at the operating system level, leading to complete host takeover. The fact that an exploit has been made public increases the risk landscape considerably, as automated scanning tools and less sophisticated attackers can now easily identify and compromise vulnerable instances without needing custom development skills.
A complicating factor in remediation is the project's use of a rolling release model for delivering continuous updates. This deployment strategy means there are no discrete version numbers to reference when determining affected or updated releases. Consequently, administrators cannot simply upgrade to a specific patched version number but must instead ensure they are running code that includes fixes from commit 0a3c45a78aaff3601b8cf9ce8ba82ff5c345caac and later. The project maintainers have been informed of the issue through an official report, yet no response or patch has been issued to date. This lack of immediate vendor remediation places the burden of mitigation squarely on system administrators and users who deploy this software in production environments.
To mitigate these risks until a formal patch is available, organizations should implement compensating controls at multiple layers of their infrastructure. Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) can be configured with rules to detect and block common SQL injection patterns targeting the ID parameter in cust_searchfrm.php. Additionally, network-level access control lists should restrict direct internet exposure of this specific endpoint if possible, limiting access only to trusted internal IP ranges or authenticated users where feasible. Code reviews focusing on all database interaction points are recommended to identify similar flaws across other modules of the application. Developers must adopt secure coding practices such as using prepared statements with parameterized queries for all SQL operations involving user input, ensuring that data and code remain strictly separated. Regular vulnerability scanning and penetration testing should be conducted to verify the effectiveness of these mitigations and detect any new exploitable conditions in the evolving software landscape.