CVE-2026-117764
Summary
by MITRE • 10/28/2026
Rejected reason: Reserved in error; never associated with a vulnerability.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/28/2026
The identifier designated as CVE-2024-XXXX was officially rejected and reserved due to an administrative error during the allocation process, meaning it does not correspond to any actual software flaw or security weakness. In the standard operating procedures of the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) program, identifiers are assigned only after a valid vulnerability has been reported, verified, and documented by a CVE Numbering Authority (CNA). When an identifier is marked as reserved in error, it indicates that the number was inadvertently allocated to a non-existent issue or duplicated during data entry, necessitating its removal from the active list of vulnerabilities. This administrative correction ensures the integrity of the global vulnerability database, preventing confusion among security professionals who rely on accurate CVE references for threat intelligence and remediation efforts.
From a technical perspective, this rejection implies that there is no exploitable code flaw, configuration error, or design weakness associated with this specific identifier. Consequently, organizations do not need to apply patches, modify configurations, or conduct vulnerability scans targeting this particular CVE ID. The absence of an underlying vulnerability means that any alerts or notifications referencing this number are likely false positives resulting from misconfigured scanning tools or outdated threat intelligence feeds. Security operations centers should treat such identifiers as null values in their risk assessment models, focusing resources instead on verified vulnerabilities that pose genuine risks to infrastructure and data confidentiality.
The operational impact of encountering a reserved-in-error identifier is primarily related to resource allocation and noise reduction within security information and event management (SIEM) systems. Analysts may initially investigate the alert, leading to unnecessary time expenditure in verifying non-existent threats. To mitigate this inefficiency, organizations should maintain updated blocklists or exclusion rules for known invalid CVE identifiers within their vulnerability management platforms. This practice streamlines incident response workflows by filtering out administrative artifacts that do not represent real-world attack vectors aligned with frameworks such as the MITRE ATT&CK matrix.
Maintaining accurate records of rejected and reserved CVEs is essential for compliance with industry standards like NIST SP 800-42, which emphasizes the importance of precise asset and vulnerability management. By recognizing this identifier as a non-vulnerability entity, security teams can avoid misallocating remediation efforts and ensure that their risk posture assessments reflect true exposure levels rather than administrative anomalies. Continuous monitoring of CVE updates and regular validation of threat intelligence sources further supports the maintenance of an accurate and actionable security landscape free from false alarms derived from reserved or erroneous identifiers.