CVE-2026-117765
Summary
by MITRE • 10/28/2026
Rejected reason: Reserved in error; never associated with a vulnerability.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/28/2026
The identifier previously designated as CVE-2024-XXXX has been officially retracted because it was reserved in error and does not correspond to any known security flaw or software defect. This situation highlights the importance of rigorous validation processes within the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) program, where potential entries are scrutinized for technical accuracy before being assigned a permanent CVE ID. When an identifier is marked as reserved in error, it indicates that the initial submission lacked sufficient evidence to substantiate a claim of vulnerability or was based on misinterpreted data, such as false positives from automated scanning tools or speculative reports without reproducible proof of exploitability.
From a technical perspective, this retraction means there is no specific Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) classification associated with the identifier, nor does it map to any entry in the MITRE ATT&CK framework related to exploitation techniques. Security information systems and vulnerability management platforms should treat this ID as invalid for tracking purposes. Organizations relying on automated feeds that aggregate CVE data must ensure their parsers are configured to ignore or flag retracted entries to prevent confusion during risk assessment activities. The absence of a valid CVE implies that no specific patch, configuration change, or mitigation strategy is required specifically for this identifier, although general security hygiene practices remain essential for overall system hardening.
The operational impact of such errors is primarily administrative rather than technical. It can cause temporary noise in vulnerability management dashboards if not properly filtered out by threat intelligence platforms. For security analysts, encountering a reserved-in-error status serves as a reminder to verify the source and credibility of vulnerability reports before initiating incident response procedures or updating asset risk scores. In cases where similar symptoms were reported alongside this erroneous ID, investigators should look for alternative CVEs that may have been filed correctly for the same underlying issue, ensuring that remediation efforts are directed toward actual vulnerabilities rather than phantom ones.
To maintain data integrity in vulnerability databases, it is recommended to regularly review retracted or reserved entries and cross-reference them with vendor advisories and independent security research publications. This practice helps distinguish between genuine threats and administrative artifacts. By adhering to these verification steps, organizations can ensure that their cybersecurity posture assessments remain accurate and focused on real-world risks rather than erroneous data points. The resolution of such errors reinforces the collaborative nature of the CVE program, where continuous feedback from researchers, vendors, and analysts leads to a more reliable global repository of known security flaws.