CVE-2026-59047 in Android
Summary
by MITRE • 11/02/2026
In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 11/02/2026
The vulnerability described represents a critical flaw within the application's internal logic that results in a Denial of Service condition, specifically categorized under CWE-835 which involves loops that never terminate or consume excessive resources due to flawed control flow. This issue stems from an incorrect implementation of conditional statements or state management mechanisms where the code fails to properly handle specific edge cases or unexpected input sequences. Instead of gracefully degrading or returning an error, the application enters a state of infinite execution or resource exhaustion, effectively halting its ability to serve legitimate requests. The severity of this flaw is compounded by the fact that it does not require elevated privileges for exploitation; any local user account can trigger the condition, making it accessible to a broad range of potential attackers within the system's trust boundary.
From an operational perspective, the impact of this vulnerability is significant as it directly compromises the availability component of the CIA triad. Since no additional execution privileges are required and user interaction is not necessary for exploitation, an attacker can automate the triggering mechanism using simple scripts or automated tools to repeatedly invoke the flawed logic paths. This allows for a sustained denial-of-service attack that can render the service unavailable to all users sharing the same system resources. The lack of need for user interaction means that social engineering tactics are unnecessary, reducing the barrier to entry significantly and increasing the likelihood of successful exploitation by opportunistic attackers or automated malware seeking to disrupt services on shared infrastructure.
In terms of industry alignment, this vulnerability aligns with ATT&CK technique T1499 which covers Endpoint Denial of Service, specifically through resource exhaustion methods that do not require privilege escalation. The logic error likely involves a failure in input validation or state transition handling where the application does not properly reset internal counters or flags after an operation completes or fails. This oversight allows subsequent operations to accumulate errors or enter recursive states without bounds checking, leading to CPU saturation or memory leaks that eventually crash the process or service hosting the vulnerable component.
Mitigation strategies must focus on hardening the code logic responsible for handling these specific workflows. Developers should implement rigorous input validation and boundary checks to ensure that all variables remain within expected ranges during execution. Additionally, introducing timeout mechanisms and resource limits can prevent any single operation from consuming excessive system resources indefinitely. Code reviews should specifically target areas where state changes occur without proper cleanup or reset procedures. Implementing automated testing with fuzzing tools can help identify these logic errors early in the development lifecycle by generating edge-case inputs that trigger infinite loops or unhandled exceptions, allowing for proactive remediation before deployment to production environments.