CVE-2026-87121 in lwIPinfo

Summary

by MITRE • 09/22/2026

lwIP TCP/IP Stack MQTT is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds write, which may allow an attacker to gain full code execution on the device.

VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.

Analysis

by VulDB Data Team • 09/22/2026

The Lightweight IP stack, commonly known as lwip, is a compact implementation of the TCP/IP protocol suite designed for resource-constrained embedded systems and Internet of Things devices. Within this ecosystem, MQTT support allows these constrained devices to communicate with brokers using the lightweight publish-subscribe messaging protocol. A critical vulnerability has been identified in the MQTT client implementation within lwIP that manifests as an out-of-bounds write operation. This flaw arises from insufficient validation of input data lengths or buffer boundaries during the processing of specific MQTT packets, particularly those involving variable-length headers or payload structures. When a maliciously crafted packet is received by the vulnerable system, the parser fails to correctly calculate the required memory allocation or bounds checking before writing data into internal buffers.

This out-of-bounds write allows an attacker who can inject network traffic targeting the affected device to overwrite adjacent memory locations that are not intended for modification. Depending on the specific layout of the stack in memory and the state of execution, this corruption can target critical control structures such as function pointers, return addresses, or global variables used by the TCP/IP stack or the MQTT client logic. The ability to arbitrarily write data beyond allocated buffer boundaries is a severe integrity violation that directly compromises the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the host system. In many embedded environments where lwIP operates without advanced memory protection features like Address Space Layout Randomization or Data Execution Prevention, this vulnerability can be exploited with high reliability to achieve arbitrary code execution.

The operational impact of successfully exploiting this flaw is catastrophic for the targeted device. An attacker gaining full code execution on an IoT endpoint typically results in complete compromise of the system's security posture. This level of access enables the adversary to exfiltrate sensitive data stored locally, manipulate sensor readings or actuator commands, install persistent malware such as botnet agents, and use the compromised device as a pivot point for further attacks against other systems within the local network segment. Given that MQTT is often used in critical infrastructure applications including industrial control systems, smart home networks, and healthcare devices, the potential consequences extend beyond simple data theft to include physical safety risks and operational disruption.

From a classification perspective, this vulnerability aligns with CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write, which describes writing to a memory location outside of the intended buffer boundary. The exploitation technique leverages improper input validation leading to memory corruption, mapping closely to MITRE ATT&CK techniques related to code injection and privilege escalation within networked embedded systems. Defenders must recognize that lwIP is frequently integrated into firmware images where patching mechanisms may be limited or difficult to deploy remotely, making proactive mitigation strategies essential for long-term security resilience.

Mitigation efforts should prioritize immediate updates to the latest stable version of lwIP if available from official repositories, as vendors often release patches addressing buffer boundary checks in protocol parsers. For systems unable to update immediately due to certification constraints or hardware limitations, network-level controls become critical. Implementing strict firewall rules that restrict MQTT traffic to trusted brokers and blocking inbound connections on standard MQTT ports such as 1883 for unencrypted communication and 8883 for TLS-secured sessions can significantly reduce the attack surface. Additionally, deploying intrusion detection systems capable of inspecting MQTT payloads for anomalous packet structures or oversized fields may help detect exploitation attempts in real-time. Application-layer security measures should also be enforced by ensuring that any custom MQTT client implementations perform rigorous length validation and bounds checking before processing incoming messages from untrusted sources.

Responsible

Icscert

Reservation

09/09/2026

Disclosure

09/22/2026

Moderation

accepted

CPE

ready

EPSS

0.00000

KEV

no

Activities

very low

Sources

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!