CVE-2026-92753 in Manager
Summary
by MITRE • 09/16/2026
PatrowlManager through 1.8.4 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the events and alerts API endpoints that lack ownership filtering. Authenticated attackers can read platform event history, delete arbitrary events, and modify alerts belonging to other users.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 09/16/2026
The PatrowlManager software, specifically versions up to and including 1.8.4, suffers from a critical authorization bypass vulnerability within its application programming interface for handling security events and alerts. This flaw stems from an insufficient implementation of access control mechanisms on the backend endpoints responsible for managing these data objects. In a properly secured system, any request to read, modify, or delete resources belonging to a specific user must be validated against that user's identity and permissions before processing occurs. However, in this vulnerable version, the API endpoints fail to enforce ownership filtering checks when handling requests related to events and alerts. This architectural oversight means that the server does not verify whether the authenticated user making the request is actually the owner of the targeted resource or has been granted explicit permission to access it by an administrator.
This technical deficiency allows any authenticated attacker, regardless of their privilege level within the application, to interact with data belonging to other users without restriction. By manipulating API parameters such as event IDs or alert identifiers, a malicious actor can bypass standard security boundaries and perform actions that should be strictly prohibited for non-owners. The vulnerability effectively neutralizes the isolation between different user accounts in the PatrowlManager environment, turning what should be private operational data into publicly accessible information among authenticated users. This represents a severe breakdown of the principle of least privilege and proper object-level access control within the application's security model.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is significant for organizations relying on PatrowlManager for their Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) or threat intelligence operations. An attacker can read sensitive platform event history, which may contain details about internal network activities, detected threats, incident response actions, and potentially confidential information regarding the organization's security posture. Furthermore, the ability to delete arbitrary events allows an adversary to cover their tracks by removing logs that might indicate malicious activity within the PatrowlManager system itself or related infrastructure. This capability undermines the integrity of audit trails and hinders forensic investigations during a security incident. Additionally, modifying alerts belonging to other users can lead to operational confusion, missed critical notifications, or the manipulation of threat intelligence data, potentially causing responders to ignore genuine threats or focus on false positives engineered by the attacker.
From a classification perspective, this vulnerability aligns with CWE-284 Improper Access Control and specifically CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key. The attack vector is consistent with MITRE ATT&CK technique T1078 Valid Accounts, as it requires initial authentication but then exploits the lack of proper authorization checks to escalate access beyond intended limits. It also relates to T1562 Impair Defenses through Indicator Blocking or Removal if used to delete events, and T1534 Internal Spearphishing if the modified alerts are used to deceive other team members. The core issue is a failure in server-side validation of resource ownership against the authenticated session context.
To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations running PatrowlManager versions 1.8.4 or earlier should immediately upgrade to the latest patched version where these authorization checks have been corrected. Until an update can be applied, administrators should consider implementing network-level controls such as web application firewalls that enforce strict validation of API requests based on user context and resource ownership. Additionally, enabling comprehensive logging of all API access attempts can help in detecting potential exploitation activities by monitoring for unusual patterns of data access or modification across different user accounts. Regular security audits focusing on authorization logic are recommended to ensure that similar flaws do not exist elsewhere in the application's architecture.