CopySafe Web Protection Plugin up to 2.5 on WordPress cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in CopySafe Web Protection Plugin up to 2.5 on WordPress and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2017-8100. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability was found in CopySafe Web Protection Plugin up to 2.5 on WordPress (WordPress Plugin). It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
There is CSRF in the CopySafe Web Protection plugin before 2.6 for WordPress, allowing attackers to change plugin settings.
The bug was discovered 04/07/2017. The weakness was published 04/24/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at seclists.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2017-8100 since 04/24/2017. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 17 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
Upgrading to version 2.6 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 98091†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: CopySafe Web Protection Plugin 2.6
Timeline
04/07/2017 🔍04/07/2017 🔍
04/24/2017 🔍
04/24/2017 🔍
04/24/2017 🔍
04/25/2017 🔍
12/21/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: seclists.orgResearcher: Wester 95
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-8100 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-8100
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-100565
SecurityFocus: 98091 - WordPress CopySafe Web Protection Plugin CVE-2017-8100 Cross Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
OSVDB: - CVE-2017-8100 - ArtistScope - CopySafe Web Protection - Cross-Site Request Forgery Issue
Entry
Created: 04/25/2017 09:03Updated: 12/21/2020 13:45
Changes: 04/25/2017 09:03 (60), 09/20/2020 20:42 (4), 12/21/2020 13:45 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.