| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability labeled as problematic has been found in IBM DOORS Next Generation 4.0/5.0/6.0. The impacted element is an unknown function. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2017-1278. The attack can be launched remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in IBM DOORS Next Generation 4.0/5.0/6.0. Affected is an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. CVE summarizes:
IBM DOORS Next Generation (DNG/RRC) 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 is vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site. IBM X-Force ID: 124756.
The bug was discovered 06/08/2017. The weakness was disclosed 06/12/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared for download at ibm.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2017-1278 since 11/30/2016. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. A authentication is necessary for exploitation. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by the victim. There are neither technical details nor an exploit publicly available. The MITRE ATT&CK project declares the attack technique as T1059.007.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 4 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 98994†). The entries VDB-102250 and VDB-102251 are pretty similar. Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.ibm.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.4
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/30/2016 🔍06/08/2017 🔍
06/08/2017 🔍
06/12/2017 🔍
06/12/2017 🔍
06/13/2017 🔍
12/27/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: ibm.comAdvisory: ibm.com
Researcher: IBM
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2017-1278 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-1278
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-102252
X-Force: 124756
SecurityFocus: 98994 - Multiple IBM Products CVE-2017-1278 HTML Injection Vulnerability
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/13/2017 08:54Updated: 12/27/2020 07:37
Changes: 06/13/2017 08:54 (60), 10/16/2019 10:56 (4), 12/27/2020 07:32 (2), 12/27/2020 07:37 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.