D-Link DNR-326 up to 2.10 Build 02 Cookie check_login cookie improper authentication
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in D-Link DNR-326 up to 2.10 Build 02. It has been classified as critical. Affected by this issue is the function check_login of the component Cookie Handler. This manipulation of the argument cookie as part of Parameter causes improper authentication.
This vulnerability appears as CVE-2014-7858. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in D-Link DNR-326 up to 2.10 Build 02. Affected by this vulnerability is the function check_login of the component Cookie Handler. The manipulation of the argument cookie as part of a Parameter leads to a improper authentication vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-287. When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The check_login function in D-Link DNR-326 before 2.10 build 03 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and log in by setting the username cookie parameter to an arbitrary string.
The bug was discovered 10/03/2014. The weakness was presented 08/25/2017 with Search-Laboratory Ltd. as not defined posting (Bugtraq). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2014-7858 since 10/03/2014. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1057 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
Upgrading to version 2.10 Build 03 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 74886†). See VDB-105732, VDB-105734 and VDB-105735 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.dlink.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper authenticationCWE: CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: DNR-326 2.10 Build 03
Timeline
10/03/2014 🔍10/03/2014 🔍
05/28/2015 🔍
08/25/2017 🔍
08/25/2017 🔍
08/27/2017 🔍
12/16/2022 🔍
Sources
Vendor: dlink.comAdvisory: 132075⛔
Organization: Search-Laboratory Ltd.
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2014-7858 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-7858
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-105733
SecurityFocus: 74886
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 08/27/2017 06:46Updated: 12/16/2022 15:35
Changes: 08/27/2017 06:46 (63), 11/10/2019 10:40 (7), 12/16/2022 15:35 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.