| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Cisco IP Phone up to 9.3(2.10). Impacted is an unknown function of the component SDP Packet Handler. Performing a manipulation results in input validation. This vulnerability was named CVE-2013-5526. There is no available exploit. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Cisco IP Phone up to 9.3(2.10) (IP Phone Software). It has been classified as critical. This affects some unknown processing of the component SDP Packet Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
Cisco 9900 fourth-generation IP phones do not properly perform SDP negotiation, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reboot) via crafted SDP packets, aka Bug ID CSCuf06698.
The weakness was presented 10/09/2013 with Cisco as Cisco Fourth-Generation RT Style IP Phone Crafted SDP Packet Vulnerability as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at tools.cisco.com. The public release was coordinated in cooperation with Cisco. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2013-5526 since 08/22/2013. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Required for exploitation is a authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 62905†), OSVDB (98254†) and Secunia (SA55231†). Further details are available at tools.cisco.com. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.cisco.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.2
VulDB Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Temp Score: 6.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/22/2013 🔍10/09/2013 🔍
10/09/2013 🔍
10/10/2013 🔍
10/10/2013 🔍
10/11/2013 🔍
03/24/2019 🔍
Sources
Vendor: cisco.comAdvisory: Cisco Fourth-Generation RT Style IP Phone Crafted SDP Packet Vulnerability
Organization: Cisco
Status: Confirmed
Coordinated: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2013-5526 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-5526
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-10653
SecurityFocus: 62905 - Cisco Unified IP Phones 9900 Series CVE-2013-5526 Denial of Service Vulnerability
Secunia: 55231 - Cisco Unified IP Phones 8900 / 9900 Series SDP Packet Handling Denial of Service Vulnerabi, Less Critical
OSVDB: 98254
Misc.: 🔍
Entry
Created: 10/11/2013 10:21Updated: 03/24/2019 19:33
Changes: 10/11/2013 10:21 (62), 03/24/2019 19:33 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Committer:
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.