Flash-album-gallery up to 4.24 on WordPress gallery.php Path information disclosure
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Flash-album-gallery up to 4.24 on WordPress and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file flagallery-skins/banner_widget_default/gallery.php. The manipulation leads to information disclosure (Path). This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2014-8491. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists. The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Flash-album-gallery up to 4.24 on WordPress (Photo Gallery Software). This issue affects an unknown part of the file flagallery-skins/banner_widget_default/gallery.php. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability (Path). Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
The Grand Flagallery plugin before 4.25 for WordPress allows remote attackers to obtain the installation path via a request to (1) flagallery-skins/banner_widget_default/gallery.php or (2) flash-album-gallery/skins/banner_widget_default/gallery.php.
The bug was discovered 11/13/2015. The weakness was disclosed 10/18/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at g0blin.co.uk. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2014-8491 since 10/27/2014. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 705 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k. By approaching the search of inurl:flagallery-skins/banner_widget_default/gallery.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
Upgrading to version 4.25 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.3
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: PathClass: Information disclosure / Path
CWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
Google Hack: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Flash-album-gallery 4.25
Timeline
10/27/2014 🔍11/13/2015 🔍
10/18/2017 🔍
10/18/2017 🔍
10/18/2017 🔍
11/25/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: g0blin.co.ukStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2014-8491 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-8491
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-107957
Entry
Created: 10/19/2017 00:10Updated: 11/25/2019 17:41
Changes: 10/19/2017 00:10 (61), 11/25/2019 17:41 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.