Circle with Disney 2.0.1 SSL Certificate Validator certificate host validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Circle with Disney 2.0.1. Impacted is an unknown function of the component SSL Certificate Validator. This manipulation causes certificate host validation. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2017-2912. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Circle with Disney 2.0.1 (Endpoint Management Software). It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown processing of the component SSL Certificate Validator. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a certificate host validation vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-297. The product communicates with a host that provides a certificate, but the product does not properly ensure that the certificate is actually associated with that host. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
An exploitable vulnerability exists in the remote control functionality of Circle with Disney running firmware 2.0.1. SSL certificates for specific domain names can cause the goclient daemon to accept a different certificate than intended. An attacker can host an HTTPS server with this certificate to trigger this vulnerability.
The bug was discovered 10/31/2017. The weakness was presented 11/07/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at talosintelligence.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-2912 since 12/01/2016. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1587.003 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 7 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
See VDB-109217, VDB-109216, VDB-109215 and VDB-109214 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.9
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.9
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.4
CNA Vector (Talos): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Certificate host validationCWE: CWE-297 / CWE-295 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/01/2016 🔍10/31/2017 🔍
11/07/2017 🔍
11/07/2017 🔍
11/08/2017 🔍
01/06/2023 🔍
Sources
Advisory: talosintelligence.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-2912 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-2912
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-109213
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 11/08/2017 07:51Updated: 01/06/2023 17:57
Changes: 11/08/2017 07:51 (58), 12/05/2019 08:44 (1), 01/06/2023 17:57 (14)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.