Cambium ePMP up to 3.5 Web Administration Console Persistent cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Cambium ePMP up to 3.5. It has been classified as problematic. The affected element is an unknown function of the component Web Administration Console. This manipulation causes cross site scripting (Persistent). This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2017-5256. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Cambium ePMP up to 3.5. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block of the component Web Administration Console. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability (Persistent). The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
In version 3.5 and prior of Cambium Networks ePMP firmware, all authenticated users have the ability to update the Device Name and System Description fields in the web administration console, and those fields are vulnerable to persistent cross-site scripting (XSS) injection.
The bug was discovered 12/19/2017. The weakness was released 12/20/2017 (Website). The advisory is shared at blog.rapid7.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-5256 since 01/09/2017. The attack can be launched remotely. The requirement for exploitation is a single authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Entries connected to this vulnerability are available at VDB-110939, VDB-110940, VDB-110942 and VDB-110943. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.4
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: PersistentClass: Cross site scripting / Persistent
CWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/09/2017 🔍12/19/2017 🔍
12/20/2017 🔍
12/20/2017 🔍
12/21/2017 🔍
12/17/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: blog.rapid7.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-5256 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-5256
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-110941
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 12/21/2017 08:47Updated: 12/17/2019 08:49
Changes: 12/21/2017 08:47 (58), 12/17/2019 08:49 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.