Plone up to 2.5-5.1rc1 Login Form came_from redirect
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Plone up to 2.5-5.1rc1. This impacts an unknown function of the component Login Form Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument came_from as part of Parameter results in redirect. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-1000481. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Plone up to 2.5-5.1rc1 (Content Management System). This affects some unknown processing of the component Login Form Handler. The manipulation of the argument came_from as part of a Parameter leads to a redirect vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-601. A web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a Redirect. This simplifies phishing attacks. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
When you visit a page where you need to login, Plone 2.5-5.1rc1 sends you to the login form with a 'came_from' parameter set to the previous url. After you login, you get redirected to the page you tried to view before. An attacker might try to abuse this by letting you click on a specially crafted link. You would login, and get redirected to the site of the attacker, letting you think that you are still on the original Plone site. Or some javascript of the attacker could be executed. Most of these types of attacks are already blocked by Plone, using the `isURLInPortal` check to make sure we only redirect to a page on the same Plone site. But a few more ways of tricking Plone into accepting a malicious link were discovered, and fixed with this hotfix.
The bug was discovered 11/28/2017. The weakness was published 01/03/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at plone.org. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2017-1000481 since 01/03/2018. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1204.001 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 36 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
Upgrading to version 2.5-5.1rc1 eliminates this vulnerability.
Similar entries are available at VDB-111288, VDB-111287 and VDB-111286. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: RedirectCWE: CWE-601
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Plone 2.5-5.1rc1
Timeline
11/28/2017 🔍01/03/2018 🔍
01/03/2018 🔍
01/03/2018 🔍
01/04/2018 🔍
12/19/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: plone.orgStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-1000481 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-1000481
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-111285
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 01/04/2018 07:33Updated: 12/19/2019 11:27
Changes: 01/04/2018 07:33 (62), 12/19/2019 11:27 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.