Tenda AC7/AC9/AC10/AC15/AC18 Web Server firewallEn memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Tenda AC7, AC9, AC10, AC15 and AC18. This affects an unknown part of the component Web Server. The manipulation of the argument firewallEn as part of POST Request leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2018-18709. An attack has to be approached locally. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Tenda AC7, AC9, AC10, AC15 and AC18. This issue affects an unknown functionality of the component Web Server. The manipulation of the argument firewallEn as part of a POST Request leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered on Tenda AC7 V15.03.06.44_CN, AC9 V15.03.05.19(6318)_CN, AC10 V15.03.06.23_CN, AC15 V15.03.05.19_CN, and AC18 V15.03.05.19(6318)_CN devices. It is a buffer overflow vulnerability in the router's web server -- httpd. When processing the "firewallEn" parameter for a post request, the value is directly used in a strcpy to a local variable placed on the stack, which overrides the return address of the function.
The bug was discovered 10/25/2018. The weakness was shared 10/28/2018 (Website). The advisory is shared at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2018-18709 since 10/27/2018. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 4 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-126028, VDB-126027 and VDB-126026 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.tenda.com.cn/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.7
VulDB Base Score: 5.9
VulDB Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/25/2018 🔍10/27/2018 🔍
10/28/2018 🔍
10/29/2018 🔍
10/29/2018 🔍
04/07/2020 🔍
Sources
Vendor: tenda.com.cnAdvisory: github.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-18709 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-18709
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-126029
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 10/29/2018 16:04Updated: 04/07/2020 09:50
Changes: 10/29/2018 16:04 (58), 04/07/2020 09:50 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.