TerraMaster TOS 3.1.03 Shared Folders cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in TerraMaster TOS 3.1.03. Affected is an unknown function of the component Shared Folders. Performing a manipulation results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability was named CVE-2018-13357. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in TerraMaster TOS 3.1.03 (Network Attached Storage Software). It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown processing of the component Shared Folders. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting in Control Panel in TerraMaster TOS version 3.1.03 allows attackers to execute JavaScript when viewing Shared Folders via JavaScript in Shared Folders' names.
The bug was discovered 06/13/2018. The weakness was presented 11/27/2018 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at blog.securityevaluators.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2018-13357 since 07/05/2018. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Required for exploitation is a authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 167 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 13368 (TerraMaster F2-240 TOS Multiple Vulnerabilities).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
See VDB-127185, VDB-127186, VDB-127187 and VDB-127188 for similar entries. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.4
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/13/2018 🔍07/05/2018 🔍
11/27/2018 🔍
11/27/2018 🔍
11/28/2018 🔍
04/15/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: blog.securityevaluators.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-13357 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-13357
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-127203
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 11/28/2018 08:17Updated: 04/15/2020 14:39
Changes: 11/28/2018 08:17 (62), 04/15/2020 14:39 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.