Toshiba Home Gateway HEM-GW16A/Home Gateway HEM-GW26A up to 1.2.9 os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Toshiba Home Gateway HEM-GW16A and Home Gateway HEM-GW26A up to 1.2.9. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to os command injection. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2018-16200. Access to the local network is required for this attack to succeed. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Toshiba Home Gateway HEM-GW16A and Home Gateway HEM-GW26A up to 1.2.9. This issue affects an unknown code. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Toshiba Home gateway HEM-GW16A 1.2.9 and earlier, Toshiba Home gateway HEM-GW26A 1.2.9 and earlier allows an attacker on the same network segment to execute arbitrary OS commands.
The bug was discovered 12/19/2018. The weakness was shared 01/09/2019 (Website). The advisory is shared at jvn.jp. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2018-16200 since 08/30/2018. The attack needs to be initiated within the local network. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/27/2020). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 21 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-128906, VDB-128907, VDB-128908 and VDB-128910 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.6
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/30/2018 🔍12/19/2018 🔍
01/09/2019 🔍
01/09/2019 🔍
01/10/2019 🔍
04/27/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: jvn.jpStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-16200 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-16200
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-128909
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 01/10/2019 20:50Updated: 04/27/2020 18:12
Changes: 01/10/2019 20:50 (56), 04/27/2020 18:12 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.