TENGCONTROL T-920 PLC 5.5 Service Port 502 Request Persistent input validation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in TENGCONTROL T-920 PLC 5.5. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Service Port 502. Such manipulation with the input \x19\xb2\x00\x00\x00\x06\x43\x01\x00\xac\xff\x00 as part of Request leads to input validation (Persistent).
This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2019-9590. The attack may be performed from remote. There is no available exploit.
Restrictive firewalling should be applied.
Details
A vulnerability was found in TENGCONTROL T-920 PLC 5.5 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Service Port 502. The manipulation with the input value \x19\xb2\x00\x00\x00\x06\x43\x01\x00\xac\xff\x00 leads to a input validation vulnerability (Persistent). Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. Impacted is availability. CVE summarizes:
An issue was discovered on TENGCONTROL T-920 PLC v5.5 devices. It allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (persistent failure mode) by sending a series of \x19\xb2\x00\x00\x00\x06\x43\x01\x00\xac\xff\x00 (aka UID 0x43) requests to TCP port 502.
The bug was discovered 03/08/2019. The weakness was presented 03/06/2019. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2019-9590 since 03/06/2019. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be launched remotely. No form of authentication is required for exploitation. Technical details are known, but there is no available exploit.
Addressing this vulnerability is possible by firewalling tcp/502.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: PersistentClass: Input validation / Persistent
CWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: FirewallStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Firewalling: 🔍
Timeline
03/06/2019 🔍03/06/2019 🔍
03/06/2019 🔍
03/08/2019 🔍
07/26/2023 🔍
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2019-9590 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-9590
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-131378
Entry
Created: 03/06/2019 19:59Updated: 07/26/2023 18:41
Changes: 03/06/2019 19:59 (57), 05/14/2020 09:28 (1), 07/26/2023 18:41 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.