Sangfor Sundray WLAN Controller up to 3.7.4.2 SSH Service hard-coded credentials
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Sangfor Sundray WLAN Controller up to 3.7.4.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component SSH Service. Performing a manipulation results in hard-coded credentials. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2019-9160. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available. It is suggested to use restrictive firewalling.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as very critical, was found in Sangfor Sundray WLAN Controller up to 3.7.4.2 (Wireless LAN Software). This affects an unknown code of the component SSH Service. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a hard-coded credentials vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-798. The product contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
WAC on the Sangfor Sundray WLAN Controller version 3.7.4.2 and earlier has a backdoor account allowing a remote attacker to login to the system via SSH (on TCP port 22345) and escalate to root (because the password for root is the WebUI admin password concatenated with a static string).
The bug was discovered 02/25/2019. The weakness was released 04/18/2019. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2019-9160 since 02/25/2019. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 09/04/2023). The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1110.001 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 52 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
It is possible to mitigate the weakness by firewalling tcp/22345.
Entry connected to this vulnerability is available at VDB-133852. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.7
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Hard-coded credentialsCWE: CWE-798 / CWE-259 / CWE-255
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: FirewallStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Firewalling: 🔍
Timeline
02/25/2019 🔍02/25/2019 🔍
04/18/2019 🔍
04/19/2019 🔍
09/04/2023 🔍
Sources
Advisory: cnvd.org.cnStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2019-9160 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-9160
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-133851
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 04/19/2019 08:12Updated: 09/04/2023 20:39
Changes: 04/19/2019 08:12 (57), 05/31/2020 09:20 (1), 09/04/2023 20:39 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.