Microsoft Windows 7/8/8.1/Server 2012 Remote Desktop Protocol cryptographic issue

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.2$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Microsoft Windows 7/8/8.1/Server 2012. This affects an unknown function of the component Remote Desktop Protocol. This manipulation causes cryptographic issue. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2014-0296. There is no exploit available. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Microsoft Windows 7/8/8.1/Server 2012 (Operating System) and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code of the component Remote Desktop Protocol. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cryptographic issue vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-310. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, and integrity.

The weakness was shared 06/10/2014 by Andrew Swoboda and Tyler Reguly with Tripwire as MS14-030 as confirmed bulletin (Technet). The advisory is shared at technet.microsoft.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2014-0296 since 12/03/2013. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1600 for this issue.

The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 74422 (MS14-030: Vulnerability in Remote Desktop Could Allow Tampering (2969259)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Windows : Microsoft Bulletins. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 90958 (Microsoft Remote Desktop Traffic Content Tampering Vulnerability (MS14-030)).

Applying the patch MS14-030 is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at technet.microsoft.com. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (93430), Tenable (74422), SecurityFocus (BID 67865†), Secunia (SA58524†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1030379†). Additional details are provided at isc.sans.edu. The entries VDB-13306, VDB-13498, VDB-13512 and VDB-13511 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.8
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2

VulDB Base Score: 4.8
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Cryptographic issue
CWE: CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Unproven

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 74422
Nessus Name: MS14-030: Vulnerability in Remote Desktop Could Allow Tampering (2969259)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍

Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Patch
Status: 🔍

Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍

Patch: MS14-030

Timelineinfo

12/03/2013 🔍
06/10/2014 +189 days 🔍
06/10/2014 +0 days 🔍
06/10/2014 +0 days 🔍
06/10/2014 +0 days 🔍
06/10/2014 +0 days 🔍
06/10/2014 +0 days 🔍
06/11/2014 +1 days 🔍
06/11/2014 +0 days 🔍
06/11/2014 +0 days 🔍
06/11/2014 +0 days 🔍
12/22/2024 +3846 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: microsoft.com
Product: microsoft.com

Advisory: MS14-030
Researcher: Andrew Swoboda, Tyler Reguly
Organization: Tripwire
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2014-0296 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-0296
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-13549

OVAL: 🔍
IAVM: 🔍

X-Force: 93430 - Microsoft Windows Remote Desktop Protocol security bypass, Medium Risk
SecurityFocus: 67865 - Microsoft Windows Remote Desktop Protocol CVE-2014-0296 Security Bypass Vulnerability
Secunia: 58524 - Microsoft Windows Remote Desktop Protocol Session Traffic Manipulation Vulnerability, Less Critical
SecurityTracker: 1030379 - Windows Remote Desktop Weak Encryption Lets Remote Users Access and Modify RDP Data
Vulnerability Center: 44884 - [MS14-030] Microsoft Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Tampering Vulnerability, Medium

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20140213
Misc.: 🔍
See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 06/11/2014 23:17
Updated: 12/22/2024 00:48
Changes: 06/11/2014 23:17 (52), 05/30/2017 11:04 (38), 06/22/2021 14:56 (3), 06/22/2021 14:59 (1), 12/22/2024 00:48 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Want to stay up to date on a daily basis?

Enable the mail alert feature now!