Aladdin Enterprises Ghostscript 2.6/3.22 ghostscript Command dSAFER Local Privilege Escalation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Aladdin Enterprises Ghostscript 2.6/3.22 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component ghostscript Command. The manipulation of the argument dSAFER leads to Local Privilege Escalation. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-1999-0155. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Aladdin Enterprises Ghostscript 2.6/3.22 (Document Processing Software). This issue affects an unknown part of the component ghostscript Command. The manipulation of the argument dSAFER with an unknown input leads to a local privilege escalation vulnerability. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
the ghostscript command with the -dsafer option allows remote attackers to execute commands.
The weakness was shared 08/31/1995. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-1999-0155. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Base Score: 5.9
VulDB Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Local Privilege EscalationCWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/31/1995 🔍08/31/1995 🔍
06/17/2014 🔍
04/03/2025 🔍
Sources
Status: Not definedCVE: CVE-1999-0155 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-1999-0155
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-13709
Entry
Created: 06/17/2014 16:36Updated: 04/03/2025 11:22
Changes: 06/17/2014 16:36 (39), 05/18/2018 09:19 (6), 04/03/2025 11:22 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.