SPIP up to 3.2.6 _core_/plugins/medias input validation

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.2$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in SPIP up to 3.2.6 and classified as critical. This affects an unknown part of the file _core_/plugins/medias. This manipulation causes input validation. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2019-19830. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available. The affected component should be upgraded.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability has been found in SPIP up to 3.2.6 (Content Management System) and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the file _core_/plugins/medias. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

_core_/plugins/medias in SPIP 3.2.x before 3.2.7 allows remote authenticated authors to inject content into the database.

The weakness was published 12/17/2019. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2019-19830 since 12/17/2019. The attack can be launched remotely. A single authentication is necessary for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.

Upgrading to version 3.2.7 eliminates this vulnerability.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Name

Version

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.4
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.2

VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Input validation
CWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Upgrade: SPIP 3.2.7
Patch: git.spip.net

Timelineinfo

12/17/2019 🔍
12/17/2019 +0 days 🔍
12/18/2019 +1 days 🔍
03/12/2024 +1546 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: 8eb11ba132b92696eb34d606d71aa8edf40e0f69
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2019-19830 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-19830
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-147325

Entryinfo

Created: 12/18/2019 08:16
Updated: 03/12/2024 16:37
Changes: 12/18/2019 08:16 (36), 12/18/2019 08:21 (18), 03/12/2024 16:30 (6), 03/12/2024 16:37 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!