NAI PGP 5.0 Linux/5.0i/6.5 Linux pgpk /dev/random missing encryption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in NAI PGP 5.0 Linux/5.0i/6.5 Linux. It has been rated as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the file /dev/random of the component pgpk. This manipulation causes missing encryption. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2000-0445. Furthermore, there is an exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in NAI PGP 5.0 Linux/5.0i/6.5 Linux. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the file /dev/random of the component pgpk. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a missing encryption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-311. The product does not encrypt sensitive or critical information before storage or transmission. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
The pgpk command in PGP 5.x on Unix systems uses an insufficiently random data source for non-interactive key pair generation, which may produce predictable keys.
The weakness was shared 05/23/2000 by Germano Caronni as confirmed advisory (CERT.org). The advisory is shared at cert.org. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2000-0445. The exploitation appears to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details and also a exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1600 for this issue.
After immediately, there has been an exploit disclosed. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (4570), SecurityFocus (BID 1251†) and OSVDB (1355†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.6
VulDB Base Score: 4.0
VulDB Temp Score: 3.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Missing encryptionCWE: CWE-311 / CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/23/2000 🔍05/23/2000 🔍
05/24/2000 🔍
05/24/2000 🔍
02/21/2003 🔍
06/24/2014 🔍
04/21/2026 🔍
Sources
Advisory: cert.orgResearcher: Germano Caronni
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2000-0445 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2000-0445
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-15589
X-Force: 4570
SecurityFocus: 1251 - Multiple Vendor PGP5 Automatic Key Generation Routine Vulnerability
OSVDB: 1355 - PGP Predictable Key Generation
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 06/24/2014 18:05Updated: 04/21/2026 17:35
Changes: 06/24/2014 18:05 (58), 05/24/2018 21:36 (2), 04/21/2026 17:35 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.