Sam Lantinga splitvt 1.6.3 Screen Lock Password memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Sam Lantinga splitvt 1.6.3. This affects an unknown part of the component Screen Lock. The manipulation of the argument Password leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2000-0467. Additionally, an exploit exists. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Sam Lantinga splitvt 1.6.3 and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown functionality of the component Screen Lock. The manipulation of the argument Password with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Buffer overflow in Linux splitvt 1.6.3 and earlier allows local users to gain root privileges via a long password in the screen locking function.
The weakness was released 06/01/2000 as not defined posting (Bugtraq). It is possible to read the advisory at archives.neohapsis.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2000-0467. The exploitation is known to be easy. Attacking locally is a requirement. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known.
A public exploit has been developed in ANSI C. The exploit is available at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
Upgrading to version 1.6.4 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (20013) and SecurityFocus (BID 1346†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Base Score: 9.3
VulDB Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: splitvt 1.6.4
Timeline
06/01/2000 🔍06/01/2000 🔍
06/01/2000 🔍
06/24/2014 🔍
12/06/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2000-0467 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2000-0467
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-15611
SecurityFocus: 1346 - splitvt 1.6.3 Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 06/24/2014 23:35Updated: 12/06/2024 19:53
Changes: 06/24/2014 23:35 (57), 05/25/2018 10:10 (1), 12/06/2024 19:53 (19)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.