| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in NetBSD and OpenBSD 1.4.1 and classified as critical. This impacts an unknown function of the component mopd. The manipulation leads to format string. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2000-0751. In addition, an exploit is available. The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability was found in NetBSD and OpenBSD 1.4.1 (Operating System). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown part of the component mopd. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a format string vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-134. The product uses a function that accepts a format string as an argument, but the format string originates from an external source. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
mopd (Maintenance Operations Protocol loader daemon) does not properly cleanse user-injected format strings, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands.
The weakness was presented 10/20/2000 (Website). The advisory is shared at archives.neohapsis.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2000-0751. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
The exploit is available at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (26630) and SecurityFocus (BID 1559†). See VDB-15892 for similar entry. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Format stringCWE: CWE-134 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
08/08/2000 🔍10/20/2000 🔍
10/20/2000 🔍
06/27/2014 🔍
01/10/2025 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2000-0751 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2000-0751
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-15893
SecurityFocus: 1559 - Multiple Vendor mopd User Inputted Data Used as Format String Vulnerability
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/27/2014 17:24Updated: 01/10/2025 11:15
Changes: 06/27/2014 17:24 (37), 04/06/2019 07:04 (14), 01/10/2025 11:15 (27)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.