ModSecurity up to 3.0.4 resource consumption ⚔ [Disputed]

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.6$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in ModSecurity 3.0.0/3.0.1/3.0.2/3.0.3/3.0.4. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to resource consumption. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2020-15598. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in ModSecurity 3.0.0/3.0.1/3.0.2/3.0.3/3.0.4. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a resource consumption vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-400. The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource, thereby enabling an actor to influence the amount of resources consumed, eventually leading to the exhaustion of available resources. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:

Trustwave ModSecurity 3.x through 3.0.4 allows denial of service via a special request. NOTE: The discoverer reports "Trustwave has signaled they are disputing our claims." The CVE suggests that there is a security issue with how ModSecurity handles regular expressions that can result in a Denial of Service condition. The vendor does not consider this as a security issue because1) there is no default configuration issue here. An attacker would need to know that a rule using a potentially problematic regular expression was in place, 2) the attacker would need to know the basic nature of the regular expression itself to exploit any resource issues. It's well known that regular expression usage can be taxing on system resources regardless of the use case. It is up to the administrator to decide on when it is appropriate to trade resources for potential security benefit

The weakness was disclosed 09/14/2020 by Ervin Hegedüs as confirmed mailinglist post (Full-Disclosure). The advisory is shared at seclists.org. The public release has been coordinated in cooperation with the project team. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2020-15598. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a private exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1499 for this issue. The following code is the reason for this vulnerability:

do { rc = pcre_exec(m_pc, …) … } while (rc > 0)

A private exploit has been developed by Ervin Hegedüs. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 91 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment.

Applying the patch cve-2020-15598.patch is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at gist.githubusercontent.com. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.

Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.8
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6

VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Researcher Base Score: 7.5
Researcher Vector: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Resource consumption
CWE: CWE-400 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Access: Private
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Author: Ervin Hegedüs

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Patch
Status: 🔍

Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍

Patch: cve-2020-15598.patch

Timelineinfo

06/15/2020 🔍
09/14/2020 +91 days 🔍
09/14/2020 +0 days 🔍
09/21/2020 +7 days 🔍
08/04/2024 +1413 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: seclists.org
Researcher: Ervin Hegedüs
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
Coordinated: 🔍
Disputed: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2020-15598 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2020-15598
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-161657
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20130913

Entryinfo

Created: 09/21/2020 08:51
Updated: 08/04/2024 18:07
Changes: 09/21/2020 08:51 (59), 09/21/2020 08:56 (2), 10/06/2020 20:51 (1), 08/04/2024 18:07 (35)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Are you interested in using VulDB?

Download the whitepaper to learn more about our service!

n $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] ?? '0.0.0.0'; } } ?>