Michael Glickman itetris/xitetris 1.6.1/1.6.2 PATH privileges management
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Michael Glickman itetris and xitetris 1.6.1/1.6.2. This impacts an unknown function. The manipulation of the argument PATH as part of Environment Variable leads to privileges management. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2001-0087. Additionally, an exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Michael Glickman itetris and xitetris 1.6.1/1.6.2 and classified as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation of the argument PATH as part of a Environment Variable leads to a privileges management vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
itetris/xitetris 1.6.2 and earlier trusts the PATH environmental variable to find and execute the gunzip program, which allows local users to gain root privileges by changing their PATH so that it points to a malicious gunzip program.
The weakness was released 02/12/2001 by FIRST (Website). The advisory is shared at archives.neohapsis.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2001-0087. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
A public exploit has been developed in ANSI C. The exploit is available at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (5795), Exploit-DB (20517) and SecurityFocus (BID 2139†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.9
VulDB Base Score: 8.4
VulDB Temp Score: 7.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/19/2000 🔍02/12/2001 🔍
02/12/2001 🔍
07/03/2014 🔍
10/18/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comResearcher: FIRST
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2001-0087 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2001-0087
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-16421
X-Force: 5795 - Itetris svgalib PATH
SecurityFocus: 2139 - Itetris Privileged Arbitrary Command Execution Vulnerability
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 07/03/2014 11:15Updated: 10/18/2024 18:11
Changes: 07/03/2014 11:15 (57), 04/07/2019 14:46 (2), 10/18/2024 18:11 (19)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.