| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Pingtel xpressa 1.2.5/1.2.7.4. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Sign-In Handler. The manipulation leads to privileges management. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2002-0673. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Pingtel xpressa 1.2.5/1.2.7.4 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown functionality of the component Sign-In Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The enrollment process for Pingtel xpressa SIP-based voice-over-IP phone 1.2.5 through 1.2.7.4 allows attackers with physical access to the phone to log out the current user and re-register the phone using MyPingtel Sign-In to gain remote access and perform unauthorized actions.
The weakness was shared 07/23/2002 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at pingtel.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2002-0673. The exploitation is known to be easy. Attacking locally is a requirement. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1068 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at X-Force (9568). The entries VDB-18414, VDB-18415, VDB-18416 and VDB-18417 are related to this item. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Base Score: 5.9
VulDB Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/23/2002 🔍07/23/2002 🔍
07/11/2014 🔍
06/23/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: pingtel.comStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2002-0673 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2002-0673
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-18419
X-Force: 9568
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 07/11/2014 14:25Updated: 06/23/2024 15:51
Changes: 07/11/2014 14:25 (41), 06/07/2018 09:04 (6), 06/23/2024 15:51 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.