East Technologies East-Tec Eraser 2002 NTFS File System information disclosure
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in East Technologies East-Tec Eraser 2002. This affects an unknown function of the component NTFS File System Handler. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2002-2067. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in East Technologies East-Tec Eraser 2002. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown code of the component NTFS File System Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. Impacted is confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
East-Tec Eraser 2002 does not clear Windows alternate data streams that are attached to files on NTFS file systems, which allows attackers to recover sensitive information that was supposed to be deleted.
The weakness was shared 12/31/2002 by Kurt Seifried (Website). The advisory is shared at seifried.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2002-2067 since 07/14/2005. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (7953) and SecurityFocus (BID 3912†). The entries VDB-19708, VDB-19710, VDB-19711 and VDB-19712 are related to this item. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/21/2002 🔍12/31/2002 🔍
12/31/2002 🔍
07/14/2005 🔍
08/06/2014 🔍
07/08/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: seifried.orgResearcher: Kurt Seifried
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2002-2067 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2002-2067
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-19709
X-Force: 7953
SecurityFocus: 3912 - Multiple Vendor NTFS File Wipe Vulnerability
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 08/06/2014 10:08Updated: 07/08/2024 12:22
Changes: 08/06/2014 10:08 (48), 04/20/2019 00:30 (4), 07/08/2024 12:22 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.