| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in GNU C Library 2.3.2. This affects the function getifaddrs. The manipulation leads to denial of service.
This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2003-0859. There is no exploit available.
It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability was found in GNU C Library 2.3.2 (Software Library) and classified as problematic. This issue affects the function getifaddrs. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
The getifaddrs function in GNU libc (glibc) 2.2.4 and earlier allows local users to cause a denial of service by sending spoofed messages as other users to the kernel netlink interface.
The weakness was shared 12/15/2003 (Website). The advisory is shared at redhat.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2003-0859 since 10/10/2003. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 13661 (Fedora Core 1 : glibc-2.3.2-101.1 (2003-002)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Fedora Local Security Checks and running in the context l.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published even before and not after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (13751), Tenable (13661), SecurityFocus (BID 9027†), OSVDB (55381†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-22187†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.gnu.org/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Base Score: 6.2
VulDB Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 13661
Nessus Name: Fedora Core 1 : glibc-2.3.2-101.1 (2003-002)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍
Nessus Port: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
10/10/2003 🔍11/12/2003 🔍
11/14/2003 🔍
12/15/2003 🔍
12/15/2003 🔍
12/15/2003 🔍
07/23/2004 🔍
05/26/2009 🔍
08/21/2014 🔍
09/05/2019 🔍
Sources
Vendor: gnu.orgAdvisory: redhat.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2003-0859 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2003-0859
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-21029
OVAL: 🔍
X-Force: 13751
SecurityFocus: 9027 - Spoofed Kernel Netlink Interface Message Denial of Service Vulnerability
OSVDB: 55381 - CVE-2003-0859 - Glibc - Denial-Of-Service Issue
Vulnerability Center: 22187 - GNU libc 2.2.4 and Earlier Getifaddrs Function Local Denial of Service Vulnerability, Low
Entry
Created: 08/21/2014 17:33Updated: 09/05/2019 06:59
Changes: 08/21/2014 17:33 (67), 09/05/2019 06:59 (4)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.