| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Nessus 2.0.10a. Impacted is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in credentials management. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2004-2722. There is no exploit available. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. It is recommended to add additional authentication.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Nessus 2.0.10a. This affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a credentials management vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-255. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
** disputed ** nessus 2.0.10a stores account passwords in plaintext in .nessusrc files which allows local users to obtain passwords. note: the original researcher reports that the vendor has disputed this issue.
The bug was discovered 12/02/2003. The weakness was shared 12/31/2004 by Kevin Davis (Website). The advisory is shared at archives.neohapsis.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2004-2722 since 10/06/2007. The exploitability is told to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1552 for this issue.
After even before and not, there has been an exploit disclosed. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 121 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment.
It is possible to mitigate the problem by adding an authentication mechanism.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (15644), OSVDB (4816†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1009575†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.0
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Credentials managementCWE: CWE-255
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: AuthenticationStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/02/2003 🔍03/25/2004 🔍
03/29/2004 🔍
04/02/2004 🔍
12/31/2004 🔍
12/31/2004 🔍
10/06/2007 🔍
03/10/2015 🔍
08/08/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comResearcher: Kevin Davis
Status: Not defined
Disputed: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2004-2722 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2004-2722
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-23589
X-Force: 15644 - Nessus .nessusrc files contain usernames and passwords in plain text
OSVDB: 4816 - Nessus .nessusrc Username and Password Disclosure
SecurityTracker: 1009575
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20091204
Entry
Created: 03/10/2015 12:14Updated: 08/08/2024 06:44
Changes: 03/10/2015 12:14 (48), 08/13/2018 07:05 (11), 08/08/2024 06:44 (16)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.