| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in uthenticode 1.0.9. It has been classified as problematic. The impacted element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in signature verification. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2023-39969. There is not any exploit available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability was found in uthenticode 1.0.9. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a signature verification vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-347. The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
uthenticode is a small cross-platform library for partially verifying Authenticode digital signatures. Version 1.0.9 of uthenticode hashed the entire file rather than hashing sections by virtual address, in violation of the Authenticode specification. As a result, an attacker could modify code within a binary without changing its Authenticode hash, making it appear valid from uthenticode's perspective. Versions of uthenticode prior to 1.0.9 are not vulnerable to this attack, nor are versions in the 2.x series. By design, uthenticode does not perform full-chain validation. However, the malleability of signature verification introduced in 1.0.9 was an unintended oversight. The 2.x series addresses the vulnerability. Versions prior to 1.0.9 are also not vulnerable, but users are encouraged to upgrade rather than downgrade. There are no workarounds to this vulnerability.
The weakness was released 08/09/2023 as GHSA-rc7g-99x7-4p9g. The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2023-39969 since 08/07/2023. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
Upgrading to version 1.0.9 or 2.0 eliminates this vulnerability. Applying the patch 8670b7bb9154d79c276483dcb7c9e9fd5e66455b is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at github.com. The best possible mitigation is suggested to be upgrading to the latest version.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 2.6
VulDB Temp Score: 2.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.0
CNA Vector (GitHub, Inc.): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Signature verificationCWE: CWE-347 / CWE-345
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: uthenticode 1.0.9/2.0
Patch: 8670b7bb9154d79c276483dcb7c9e9fd5e66455b
Timeline
08/07/2023 🔍08/09/2023 🔍
08/09/2023 🔍
09/02/2023 🔍
Sources
Advisory: GHSA-rc7g-99x7-4p9gStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2023-39969 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-39969
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-236661
Entry
Created: 08/09/2023 20:20Updated: 09/02/2023 15:29
Changes: 08/09/2023 20:20 (40), 09/02/2023 15:29 (21)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.