| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in mlterm up to 2.9.1. It has been rated as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the component gdk-pixbuf. Performing a manipulation results in integer coercion. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2005-0686. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in mlterm up to 2.9.1. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown function of the component gdk-pixbuf. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a integer coercion vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-192. Integer coercion refers to a set of flaws pertaining to the type casting, extension, or truncation of primitive data types. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Integer overflow in mlterm 2.5.0 through 2.9.1, with gdk-pixbuf support enabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large image file that is used as a background.
The weakness was published 03/07/2005 (Website). The advisory is shared at sourceforge.net. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2005-0686 since 03/09/2005. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 17287 (GLSA-200503-13 : mlterm: Integer overflow vulnerability), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Gentoo Local Security Checks.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (19620), Tenable (17287) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-22848†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Integer coercionCWE: CWE-192 / CWE-189
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 17287
Nessus Name: GLSA-200503-13 : mlterm: Integer overflow vulnerability
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Port: 🔍
OpenVAS ID: 54878
OpenVAS Name: Gentoo Security Advisory GLSA 200503-13 (mlterm)
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/07/2005 🔍03/07/2005 🔍
03/07/2005 🔍
03/08/2005 🔍
03/09/2005 🔍
07/14/2009 🔍
03/10/2015 🔍
07/01/2021 🔍
Sources
Advisory: sourceforge.netStatus: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2005-0686 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2005-0686
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-24045
X-Force: 19620
Vulnerability Center: 22848 - Mlterm 2.5.0 Through 2.9.1 Integer Overflow Remote Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability via Image, High
Entry
Created: 03/10/2015 15:27Updated: 07/01/2021 14:05
Changes: 03/10/2015 15:27 (55), 02/11/2017 10:37 (8), 07/01/2021 14:05 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.