Foxmail Email Server 2.0 memory corruption

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
9.4$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Foxmail Email Server 2.0 and classified as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2005-0635. Furthermore, an exploit is available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as very critical, has been found in Foxmail Email Server 2.0 (Mail Server Software). This issue affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Buffer overflow in Foxmail Server 2.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long USER command.

The weakness was published 03/02/2005 by Xin Ouyang with Fortinet (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2005-0635 since 03/04/2005. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 07/22/2017).

A public exploit has been developed by Swan in Python and been published even before and not after the advisory. The exploit is available at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (854), SecurityFocus (BID 12711†), OSVDB (14370†), Secunia (SA14145†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1013356†). Similar entries are available at VDB-24028 and VDB-24414. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.4

VulDB Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Temp Score: 9.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Memory corruption
CWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Author: Swan
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Exploit-DB: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

02/08/2005 🔍
03/02/2005 +22 days 🔍
03/02/2005 +0 days 🔍
03/02/2005 +0 days 🔍
03/02/2005 +0 days 🔍
03/02/2005 +0 days 🔍
03/04/2005 +1 days 🔍
03/04/2005 +0 days 🔍
05/02/2005 +58 days 🔍
03/10/2015 +3599 days 🔍
07/22/2017 +865 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔
Researcher: Xin Ouyang
Organization: Fortinet
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2005-0635 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2005-0635
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-24545
SecurityFocus: 12711 - Foxmail USER Command Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 14145 - Foxmail Server Multiple Vulnerabilities, Highly Critical
OSVDB: 14370 - Foxmail Server USER Command Remote Overflow
SecurityTracker: 1013356 - Foxmail Server Buffer Overflow in USER Command Lets Remote Users Execute Arbitrary Code

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/10/2015 23:05
Updated: 07/22/2017 10:21
Changes: 03/10/2015 23:05 (62), 07/22/2017 10:21 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Do you know our Splunk app?

Download it now for free!