IRC Services NickServ LISTLINKS up to 5.0.49 information disclosure
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in IRC Services NickServ LISTLINKS up to 5.0.49 and classified as problematic. This affects an unknown function. This manipulation causes information disclosure. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2005-0987. There is no exploit available. The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in IRC Services NickServ LISTLINKS up to 5.0.49 (Chat Software). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Unknown vulnerability in IRC Services NickServ LISTLINKS before 5.0.50 allows remote attackers to obtain the links of a nick.
The weakness was shared 05/02/2005 (Website). The advisory is shared at securitytracker.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2005-0987 since 04/06/2005. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 5.0.50 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityTracker (ID 1013622†). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
- 5.0.0
- 5.0.1
- 5.0.2
- 5.0.3
- 5.0.4
- 5.0.5
- 5.0.6
- 5.0.7
- 5.0.8
- 5.0.9
- 5.0.10
- 5.0.11
- 5.0.12
- 5.0.13
- 5.0.14
- 5.0.15
- 5.0.16
- 5.0.17
- 5.0.18
- 5.0.19
- 5.0.20
- 5.0.21
- 5.0.22
- 5.0.23
- 5.0.24
- 5.0.25
- 5.0.26
- 5.0.27
- 5.0.28
- 5.0.29
- 5.0.30
- 5.0.31
- 5.0.32
- 5.0.33
- 5.0.34
- 5.0.35
- 5.0.36
- 5.0.37
- 5.0.38
- 5.0.39
- 5.0.40
- 5.0.41
- 5.0.42
- 5.0.43
- 5.0.44
- 5.0.45
- 5.0.46
- 5.0.47
- 5.0.48
- 5.0.49
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: NickServ LISTLINKS 5.0.50
Timeline
04/01/2005 🔍04/06/2005 🔍
05/02/2005 🔍
05/02/2005 🔍
03/10/2015 🔍
07/23/2017 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securitytracker.com⛔Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2005-0987 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2005-0987
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-24769
SecurityTracker: 1013622 - IRC Services LISTLINKS Discloses Link Lists to Remote Users
Entry
Created: 03/10/2015 23:05Updated: 07/23/2017 10:37
Changes: 03/10/2015 23:05 (47), 07/23/2017 10:37 (6)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:22D:103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.