Flient Smart Door Lock 1.0 NFC Tag missing encryption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Flient Smart Door Lock 1.0 and classified as problematic. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component NFC Tag Handler. This manipulation causes missing encryption. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2023-50129. It is feasible to perform the attack on the physical device. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Flient Smart Door Lock 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the component NFC Tag Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a missing encryption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-311. The product does not encrypt sensitive or critical information before storage or transmission. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Missing encryption in the NFC tags of the Flient Smart Door Lock v1.0 allows attackers to create a cloned tag via brief physical proximity to the original tags, which results in an attacker gaining access to the perimeter.
The weakness was disclosed 01/12/2024. The advisory is shared at secura.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2023-50129 since 12/04/2023. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1600 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 2.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 2.0
VulDB Base Score: 2.0
VulDB Temp Score: 2.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Missing encryptionCWE: CWE-311 / CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Yes
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
12/04/2023 🔍01/11/2024 🔍
01/12/2024 🔍
01/12/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: secura.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2023-50129 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2023-50129
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-250477
Entry
Created: 01/12/2024 00:46Changes: 01/12/2024 00:46 (38)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.