MaxWebPortal up to 1.3.5 post.asp Type cross site scripting

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
3.9$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in MaxWebPortal 1.3.0/1.3.1/1.3.2/1.3.3/1.3.5 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file post.asp. This manipulation of the argument Type causes cross site scripting. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2005-1561. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in MaxWebPortal 1.3.0/1.3.1/1.3.2/1.3.3/1.3.5. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the file post.asp. The manipulation of the argument type with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in post.asp in MaxWebPortal 1.3.5 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) mod, (2) M, or (3) type parameter.

The bug was discovered 05/11/2005. The weakness was disclosed 05/11/2005 by Zinho (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at archives.neohapsis.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2005-1561 since 05/14/2005. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.

After even before and not, there has been an exploit disclosed. It is possible to download the exploit at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. By approaching the search of inurl:post.asp it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking. The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 18248 (MaxWebPortal <= 1.35 Multiple Vulnerabilities), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family CGI abuses and running in the context r.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (20560), Exploit-DB (25651), Tenable (18248), SecurityFocus (BID 13601†) and OSVDB (16501†). The entries VDB-25148, VDB-82502, VDB-82503 and VDB-82504 are pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1

VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Cross site scripting
CWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 18248
Nessus Name: MaxWebPortal <= 1.35 Multiple Vulnerabilities
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍

Exploit-DB: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

05/11/2005 🔍
05/11/2005 +0 days 🔍
05/11/2005 +0 days 🔍
05/11/2005 +0 days 🔍
05/11/2005 +0 days 🔍
05/11/2005 +0 days 🔍
05/11/2005 +0 days 🔍
05/12/2005 +0 days 🔍
05/14/2005 +2 days 🔍
05/14/2005 +0 days 🔍
05/16/2005 +1 days 🔍
03/11/2015 +3586 days 🔍
08/24/2024 +3454 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: archives.neohapsis.com
Researcher: Zinho
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2005-1561 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2005-1561
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-25147
X-Force: 20560
SecurityFocus: 13601 - MaxWebPortal Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 15329 - MaxWebPortal Cross-Site Scripting and SQL Injection, Moderately Critical
OSVDB: 16501 - MaxWebPortal post.asp Multiple Parameter XSS
Vulnerability Center: 7970 - Multiple XSS in MaxWebPortal via post.asp, Medium

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/11/2015 11:41
Updated: 08/24/2024 19:22
Changes: 03/11/2015 11:41 (75), 06/01/2019 12:27 (1), 08/24/2024 19:22 (21)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Are you interested in using VulDB?

Download the whitepaper to learn more about our service!