Symantec Veritas Backup Exec up to 9.0 ndmlsrvr.dll denial of service
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Symantec Veritas Backup Exec up to 9.0. It has been classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality in the library ndmlsrvr.dll. This manipulation causes denial of service. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2005-0772. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Symantec Veritas Backup Exec up to 9.0 (Backup Software). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block in the library ndmlsrvr.dll. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:
VERITAS Backup Exec 9.0 through 10.0 for Windows Servers, and 9.0.4019 through 9.1.307 for Netware, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Remote Agent crash) via (1) a crafted packet in NDMLSRVR.DLL or (2) a request packet with an invalid (non-0) "Error Status" value, which triggers a null dereference.
The weakness was disclosed 06/28/2005 by Sebastian Apelt (Website). The advisory is shared at idefense.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2005-0772 since 03/18/2005. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (21112), SecurityFocus (BID 14021†), OSVDB (17626†), Secunia (SA15798†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1014273†). The entries VDB-25596 and VDB-25568 are pretty similar. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
McAfee IPS: 🔍
McAfee IPS Version: 🔍
SourceFire IPS: 🔍
ISS Proventia IPS: 🔍
PaloAlto IPS: 🔍
Fortigate IPS: 🔍
Timeline
03/18/2005 🔍06/22/2005 🔍
06/23/2005 🔍
06/28/2005 🔍
06/28/2005 🔍
08/08/2005 🔍
03/11/2015 🔍
06/08/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: idefense.com⛔Researcher: Sebastian Apelt
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2005-0772 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2005-0772
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-25597
X-Force: 21112
SecurityFocus: 14021 - Veritas Backup Exec Remote Agent Null Pointer Dereference Denial Of Service Vulnerability
Secunia: 15798
OSVDB: 17626 - VERITAS Backup Exec Agent NDMLSRVR.DLL Remote DoS
SecurityTracker: 1014273
Vulnerability Center: 8838 - Veritas Backup Exec DoS via NDMLSRVR.DLL or invalid Error Status, High
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/11/2015 11:41Updated: 06/08/2019 08:37
Changes: 03/11/2015 11:41 (62), 06/08/2019 08:37 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.